首页> 外文OA文献 >Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses:value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification
【2h】

Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses:value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification

机译:良性和恶性乳腺肿块的区别:根据病变刚度的剪切波弹性成像和结合BI-RADS分类的灰度超声的值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:The aim of this study was to assess the performance of shear wave elastography combined with BI-RADS classification of greyscale ultrasound images for benign/malignant differentiation in a large group of patients. Methods:One hundred and seventy-five consecutive patients with solid breast masses on routine ultrasonography undergoing percutaneous biopsy had the greyscale findings classified according to the American College of Radiology BI-RADS. The mean elasticity values from four shear wave images were obtained. Results:For mean elasticity vs greyscale BI-RADS, the performance results against histology were sensitivity: 95% vs 95%, specificity: 77% vs 69%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 88% vs 84%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV): 90% vs 91%, and accuracy: 89% vs 86% (all P>0.05). The results for the combination (positive result from either modality counted as malignant) were sensitivity 100%, specificity 61%, PPV 82%, NPV 100%, and accuracy 86%. The combination of BI-RADS greyscale and shear wave elastography yielded superior sensitivity to BI-RADS alone (P=0.03) or shear wave alone (P=0.03). The NPV was superior in combination compared with either alone (BI-RADS P=0.01 and shear wave P=0.02). Conclusion:Together, BI-RADS assessment of greyscale ultrasound images and shear wave ultrasound elastography are extremely sensitive for detection of malignancy.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 12 June 2012; doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.253 www.bjcancer.com.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估剪切波弹性成像结合BI-RADS灰度超声图像分类在许多患者中的良/恶性分化表现。方法:对175例行常规超声检查的乳腺实性肿块患者进行了经皮穿刺活检,其灰度结果根据美国放射学会BI-RADS分类。从四个剪切波图像获得了平均弹性值。结果:对于平均弹性vs灰度BI-RADS,针对组织学的性能结果为敏感性:95%vs 95%,特异性:77%vs 69%,阳性预测值(PPV):88%vs 84%,阴性预测值( NPV):90%vs 91%,准确度:89%vs 86%(所有P> 0.05)。组合的结果(来自任何一种方法的阳性结果均被视为恶性)为敏感性100%,特异性61%,PPV 82%,NPV 100%和准确性86%。 BI-RADS灰度和剪切波弹性成像的结合产生了比单独使用BI-RADS(P = 0.03)或单独使用剪切波(P = 0.03)更高的灵敏度。结合使用NPV优于单独使用(BI-RADS P = 0.01和剪切波P = 0.02)。结论:BI-RADS评估灰度超声图像和剪切波超声弹性成像技术对检测恶性肿瘤非常敏感。《英国癌症杂志》在线发表,2012年6月12日; doi:10.1038 / bjc.2012.253 www.bjcancer.com。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号